Monday, January 27 | Post-Acute Care, Thought Leadership

Why Your Discharge Function Score Matters: A New Era in Home Health Quality

By Lisa Selman-Holman, Vice President, Clinical Services, McBee

The Discharge Function Score (DFS) has officially stepped into the spotlight, now featured on Care Compare with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) January 2025 refresh. As a new quality measure in the Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) model, DFS plays a critical role in determining how well agencies are meeting their patients’ expected functional abilities at discharge. With DFS carrying 20% of the total performance score for HHVBP, home health agencies cannot afford to overlook its significance.

Understanding the Discharge Function Score

The DFS evaluates your agency’s ability to help patients achieve or exceed their expected functional status upon discharge. CMS calculates an expected discharge function score for each quality episode based on patient characteristics from the OASIS-E1 assessment, focusing heavily on GG items related to mobility and self-care.

Key Points to Know:

  • The national average for DFS is 67.15% according to Care Compare.
  • Agencies must beat the achievement threshold of 62.350 to earn points in HHVBP.
  • Agencies can earn full points by surpassing the benchmark of 83.179.
  • Improvement points are awarded for surpassing your agency’s own 2023 performance.

GG Items: The Core of DFS Calculation

Properly assessing and scoring GG items in the OASIS-E1 is essential. These items measure a patient’s mobility and self-care abilities and are central to the DFS calculation.

Avoid the “Activity Not Attempted” Trap:

When GG items are marked as “Activity Not Attempted,” CMS imputes a score (1–6) for the item, essentially guessing the patient’s ability. This could misrepresent your agency’s performance. Staff should use these codes only when:

  • The patient truly cannot perform the activity.
  • The information cannot be gathered through observation or interview of the patient and/or caregiver.

Accurate Data is Key:

DFS reflects not only the GG items but a range of other OASIS-E1 responses. Ensuring accuracy across all items is critical for calculating the expected discharge scores.

Finding and Tracking Your DFS

Before the Discharge Function Score (DFS) is publicly reported on Care Compare, agencies can access their performance data in iQIES through the “Preview Report of Quality Measures to be Posted on Care Compare.” This provides agencies with a vital opportunity to evaluate and address their DFS performance. But why should agencies actively track and trend this data?

  1. Measure Improvement Efforts: Tracking DFS data allows agencies to gauge the effectiveness of their quality improvement initiatives. Whether you’ve rolled out staff education programs, implemented new assessment protocols, or focused on documentation accuracy, analyzing trends in your DFS can reveal whether your efforts are driving measurable progress.
  2. Benchmark Performance: By comparing your DFS data to national averages (currently 67.15%) and HHVBP thresholds, you can understand how your agency stacks up against peers and identify how close you are to earning achievement or improvement points. Knowing where you stand helps you target specific areas for further improvement.
  3. Proactive Problem Identification: Trend analysis can uncover underlying issues, such as frequent use of “Activity Not Attempted” codes or inconsistencies in OASIS documentation. By identifying these problems early, agencies can implement corrective actions before they affect performance scores and public perception.
  4. Optimize HHVBP Performance: Since DFS contributes 20% of the Total Performance Score for HHVBP, tracking your data helps ensure your agency meets or exceeds the achievement threshold (62.350) and targets the benchmark (83.179) for full points.
  5. Improve Public Perception: DFS is reported on Care Compare as “How often patients were at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge.” A higher score not only reflects well on your agency’s ability to deliver quality care but also attracts referrals and builds trust with patients and caregivers.
  6. Support Strategic Planning: Regular tracking enables data-driven decisions, helping leadership allocate resources, refine care strategies, and prioritize initiatives that directly improve functional outcomes and agency success.

Strategies to Improve Your Discharge Function Score

Improving your DFS requires a holistic approach that includes staff education, accurate assessments, and ongoing performance monitoring. Here are actionable steps:

  1. Educate Your Staff:
    • Train clinicians on scoring GG items accurately and avoiding unnecessary use of “Activity Not Attempted” codes.
    • Provide ongoing education on the impact of OASIS-E1 accuracy on quality measures.
  2. Optimize OASIS Documentation:
    • Ensure all OASIS items are completed thoroughly and correctly, as every detail influences the expected score.
    • Conduct regular audits to identify and correct documentation errors.
  3. Utilize Data-Driven Insights:
    • Monitor your DFS in iQIES and compare it to national benchmarks.
    • Analyze trends and target specific areas for improvement.
  4. Leverage Expert Support:
    • Partner with McBee for tailored education programs, OASIS and coding services, and HHVBP analysis to enhance your agency’s clinical and financial outcomes.

Why It Matters

With DFS accounting for a significant portion of the HHVBP Total Performance Score, agencies must prioritize this measure. Achieving a high DFS not only boosts your HHVBP performance but also strengthens your agency’s reputation on Care Compare positioning your agency as a leader in patient outcomes and quality care.

 

Meet the Author

Lisa Selman-Holman
Lisa Selman-Holman · Vice President, Clinical Services, McBee

Communities

Solutions and Services

From the CareThreads Blog

Target Denials Before They Happen: The Role of AI in Revenue Cycle Management

Target Denials Before They Happen: The Role of AI in Revenue Cycle Management

Tuesday, October 20 | Post-Acute Care,Revenue Cycle/Billing,Thought Leadership

Denials have historically been treated as a billing problem. A claim is denied. The billing team investigates. Someone tracks down documentation, contacts a payer, corrects the issue, resubmits the claim and waits. If the claim is denied again, the cycle starts over. But here’s the thing: once a denial reaches billing, the work is no longer about preventing the issue. It is about recovering from it.

Read the blog
A New National Benchmark for Personal Care Is Beginning to Take Shape

A New National Benchmark for Personal Care Is Beginning to Take Shape

Monday, October 19 | Post-Acute Care,Thought Leadership

A potentially important shift in personal care took effect on July 1, 2026. Under the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicaid Access Rule, states were required to begin publicly reporting standardized fee-for-service payment information for several home- and community-based services, including personal care, home health aide, homemaker and habilitation services. At first glance, this may look like another technical Medicaid reporting requirement. Its longer-term significance could be much greater.

Read the blog
The Hidden Gaps Driving Audit Risk in Post-Acute Care

The Hidden Gaps Driving Audit Risk in Post-Acute Care

Wednesday, October 07 | Post-Acute Care,Thought Leadership

Organizations can no longer afford to approach audit readiness as the responsibility of one department. It requires a connected strategy that spans the entire revenue cycle and helps identify risk before it becomes an audit finding.

Read the blog