Tuesday, September 12 | Post-Acute Care, Revenue Cycle/Billing
Additional documentation requests (ADR) are the norm today – everyone in home health gets them. Perhaps the best defense of documentation requests from payers (specifically Medicare) might be a stout offense that boasts an aggressive strategy of documenting every procedure at the point of care and providing specific details of the patient health plan. But even when taking an aggressive approach to defending services provided — with detailed documentation — of the patient experience, there still may be some instances when home health administrators must take action.
To do so, however, it may be worthwhile to understand exactly what some of the top reason for denial of payment are throughout the first quarter of 2017.
For CGS-processed claims, they list their top denials as: skilled nursing services were not medically necessary; physician’s certification was invalid since the required face-to-face (F2F) encounter was missing/incomplete/untimely; requested documentation was not received/or not received timely; documentation did not show that therapy services were reasonable or necessary; and initial certification was missing/incomplete/invalid, therefore, the re-certification episode is denied.
For PGBA-processed claims, they list their top denials as: requested records were not submitted; F2F encounter requirements were not met; Health Insurance Prospective Payment System (HIPPS) code change because of partial denial of therapy; no plan of care or certification; info provided does not support the medical necessity for therapy services; and unable to determine medical necessity of HIPPS code billed as appropriate, OASIS not submitted.
For NGS-processed claims, they list their top denials as: documentation submitted does not support homebound status; medical necessity not supported as OASIS not submitted; skilled observation was not needed from the start of care; skilled nursing services were not medically necessary; requested documentation not received/received untimely.
There are still many, many other reasons for denial of claims. Some of these include:
Home health administrators must review claims and must have a process in place to review end of episodes so they are clean for billing. This doesn’t mean you must quality assets (QA) 100 percent of the charts you process, but establish some sort of protocol that ensures members of your QA team review end of episodes before they are billed. In the case of responding to ADRs, they should be sent with a signed receipt request so you are able to track the documents so that you can see when the documents arrived at the claims processor and who signed for them.
Administrators also should ensure that education is provided to staff during orientation, and annually on the coverage guidelines for clinicians, so they understand what is expected to re-certify a patient for care.
Also, it’s important to understand that your caregivers should not be allowed to turn in late paperwork. Notes that are completed long after the visit are rarely accurate and these notes are reviewed in the event of an audit. Each visit note for all disciplines must stand alone and provide needed.
When it comes to documentation, the only way to go forward is transparently and the best way to do that is to be as educated as possible on best practices. Join us next time for part II of our blog series medical documentation where we’ll discuss specific areas of focus to ensure that your documentation is as thorough as possible to help ease the pain an audit can bring.
Entire blog post originally posted on DeVero, a Netsmart Solution’s blog onJuly 31, 2017.
Call to Action: Proposed Cuts Could Deprive Home Health of Necessary Funds
Wednesday, September 20 | Post-Acute Care,Value-based Care
Millions of older Americans could be greatly impacted if the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services goes through with its proposed rate cut to the Home Health Prospective Payment system for Calendar Year 2024. One of the most concerning aspects of the proposed rule revolves around its potential impact on home health reimbursement.
MoreNavigating Managed Care
A Look at the Future of Value-Based Contracting
Tuesday, June 27 | Care Coordination,EHR Solutions and Operations,Interoperability,Post-Acute Care,Value-based Care
In today's rapidly evolving healthcare landscape, managing the cost of care and improving patient outcomes are crucial priorities. To address these challenges, value-based reimbursement has emerged as a widely embraced approach. This system focuses on optimizing healthcare services while managing expenses. At the core of this strategy lies value-based contracting, a payment model that aims to align provider reimbursement with the outcomes achieved by patients. By incentivizing quality care and efficient resource utilization, value-based contracting promotes a more coordinated and effective healthcare system.
MoreHow to Select the Best Value-Based Care Models for Post-Acute Physician Practices
Wednesday, June 21 | Thought Leadership,Post-Acute Care,Value-based Care
It would be an understatement to say there’s confusion in US healthcare. But one thing is certain: fee-for-service (FFS) payment is on the wane and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) will remain dedicated to value-based care (VBC) and alternative payment models. CMS made that very clear in 2021 by establishing a goal to transition all Medicare beneficiaries to some type of value-based care solution for payments by 2030.
More