Monday, September 19 | Human Services, Thought Leadership, Value-based Care

Part 5: Current State of Peers in the United States - Demographics and Economic Impact

By Denny Morrison, Ph.D., Chief Clinical Consultant

As peer support has become central to the treatment philosophy of the seriously mentally ill in the United States, it has gradually gained acceptance as a true intervention methodology and its practitioners recognized as integral members of the treatment teams. SAMHSA has designated it as an evidence-based practice, (Benefits of Peer Services, n.d.). Guidelines and core competencies have been elaborated by SAMHSA (Core Competencies for Peer Workers, 2018) and the National Association for Peer Support (NAPS) (Foglesong et al 2021). However, the scope of peer services varies widely by state. According to Videka et al (2019), only about 25% of mental health facilities in the United States offer peer services. There is a wide variance of mental health center concentration, substance use disorder treatment facility and peer usage in the United States as shown in Table 1.  

  

As of 2018, 45 states and the District of Columbia have established or will establish training and credentialing criteria for peer workers. Here too, there are large variances from state-to-state regarding credentialing requirements as seen in Table 2.

To address this, in 2017 Mental Health America (National Certified Peer Specialist (NCPS) Certification-- Get Certified!, n.d.) launched the first national certification process for peer workers.

The value of peers has been recognized as more states develop payment methodologies for peer-related services. Georgia was the first state to do so in 1999. In 2008 there were 9 states billing for peer services. As of 2017, 41 states do so. Initial reserve about billing for “nonprofessional” services has given way to widespread adoption of peer services. Typical Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes used for peer support include: H0038, H0046, H2015, H2017, H2019 and T1012, (State Medicaid Reimbursement for Peer Support Service: An OPEN MINDS Reference Guide. 2018). While it is encouraging that billing is possible, the reimbursement rate for the CPT codes is still quite low.

The criteria for both credentialing and billing vary considerably from state to state. This is understandable since the predominant payer source for peer support is Medicaid which is administered at the state level.

For detailed information about credentialing and reimbursement for peer workers see:

 

Central to the identity of peer workers is the concept of “lived experience.” The fact that peer workers have experienced mental health challenges is what sets them apart from other care providers and what makes them uniquely effective in helping others. But what exactly is “lived experience”? As summarized in Table 3, a survey of nearly 600 peer workers conducted by Cronise et al (2016) found a wide range of overlapping issues that described lived experience.    

  

In the same study, the authors identified a variety of job titles for people doing peer work. Peer specialist/peer support specialist was the clear favorite, but others are frequently used as well as shown in Table 4.

In our next and final blog of this series, we will discuss the clinical success of peer support, the challenges peers face in the workforce and how the future of peers will evolve and grow.  

A look back on the rest of the peer support series:

Part 1: Origins of Peer Support in Mental Health

Part 2: Development of Peer Support in the United States and Other Regions of the World

Part 3: Public Policy and the Professionalization of Peers

Part 4: Role of Peers and Mutual Support in Alcoholics Anonymous

 

 

 

References Part 5

 

 


 

 

Meet the Author

Danny Morrison
Denny Morrison, Ph.D. · Chief Clinical Consultant

Solutions and Services

From the CareThreads Blog

Why Rising Acuity is Exposing the Limits of Fragmented Systems

Why Rising Acuity Is Exposing the Limits of Fragmented Systems

Wednesday, May 27 | Post-Acute Care,Care Coordination,Thought Leadership

Something fundamental has shifted in senior living, and most organizations feel it every day. Residents are delaying move-in and ultimately arriving with more complex needs than many communities were designed to support. Residents and their families still want exceptional hospitality and services. Referring providers and partners expect clinical coordination while payers demand outcomes supported by data. And operators are expected to deliver all three at the same time and at scale.

Read the blog
From Cleanup to Clean Claims: Rethinking Eligibility in Post-Acute Care

From Cleanup to Clean Claims: Rethinking Eligibility in Post-Acute Care

Thursday, May 21 | Post-Acute Care,Thought Leadership

Eligibility in post-acute care has become a complex and financially impactful challenge in the revenue cycle. What started as a once-a-year administrative task is now a continuous operational pressure point. Yet many organizations are still treating eligibility as something to clean up after issues arise. That approach is becoming difficult to maintain as payer requirements shift, patient coverage changes more frequently and teams are stretched thin. The result isn’t just inefficiency. It’s real financial risk.

Read the blog
Curbside Care

Curbside Care: How Mobile Mental Healthcare Is Rewriting Public Health

Thursday, April 30 | Thought Leadership,EHR Solutions and Operations

The growth of mobile healthcare is now one of the more striking trends in American public health. It’s a movement quietly reshaping how communities respond to crisis, deliver preventive care and close stubborn gaps in health equity.

Read the blog