Wednesday, April 10 |
According to the Joint Commission, 57% of compliance issues discovered in 2017 were treatment plan related – making it the #1 ranked compliance issue. Compliance audits that result in negative findings from authorized bodies such as Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) or the Joint Commission can reduce or remove federal funding from an agency in extreme cases. Prior to fund removal, there is a correction period where the agency is allotted time to bring their treatment plan documentation up to standards. The process of correcting treatment plans during this period can be costly to your organization.
Ultimately, the time your staff has to spend redesigning treatment plans (or any documentation for that matter) reduces the amount of hours to deliver services and also impacts the client. What happens when there are multiple revision periods as a result of the audit process? More time is taken away from client services. Also consider the soft costs: unwarranted stress on the design team, frustration from the clinicians who must learn the new documentation, and the adoption time for implementing the new documentation. These factors may end up costing more than the hard dollar cost of the compliance changes. On top of that, ever-changing processes and documentation changes can increase burn out rates, which can lead to high employee turnover rates. And to replace an employee could cost the agency nearly seven times the replacement salary when considering ramp up time, benefits, and other onboarding costs. The soft costs can be just as debilitating to an agency as the hard costs of maintaining compliance.
To help you avoid this additional cost, we’ve listed 3 ways your agency can meet compliance standards when it comes to treatment plans: