Thursday, January 10 | Interoperability, Legislative/Policy, Thought Leadership

What You Need To Know About the 21st Century Cures Act Part 1: Interoperability, Integration and Mental Health

By Carol Reynolds, Executive VP, Client Experience

Almost two years ago, the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act) was signed into law. The intent of the Cures Act was to promote and fund the acceleration of research into preventing and curing serious illnesses, advance drug and medical device development, bring focus to the opioid epidemic and improve mental health service delivery. There are a number of provisions that push for greater interoperability, support for human services programs and the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs).

The Cures Act impacts nearly every aspect of healthcare, so we’re diving into the goals and intent to help you understand how your organization could be impacted and how to prepare. Today, we’ll tackle interoperability, which will be required to accomplish all of the goals of the Cures Act. Interoperability “describes the extent to which systems and devices can exchange data and interpret that shared data.” But to really be successful and achieve the desired outcomes, we need to go beyond basic interoperability and completely integrate individual clinical workflows.

Here are some examples of how we can influence change through interoperability.

  • Enable users to order and view lab test results. With thousands of labs across the U.S., point-to-point lab connections and individual testing can be costly. This kind of data needs to be tightly integrated into a user’s EHR workflow to drive clinical decision support. Validation of payment prior to ordering labs, notification to staff when those lab results are complete, results that are outside expected ranges and a reminder when standardized tests should be ordered but haven’t been. These are a few examples of the integration that is required to achieve more connected healthcare.
  • Integrate imaging tests and other diagnostic tests into workflows. As we move more to whole-person care, where the mind and body are treated as a comprehensive view, it is even more critical that this kind of information is readily available in an EHR. The use of integrated genomic testing allows providers better insight when prescribing medications so they can more accurately and appropriately find the right medication the first time. This kind of precision medicine moves us closer to whole-person care.
  • Exchange data with clinical registries. Having insight into public health data enables greater collaboration in the management of the health and wellness of a population. Enabling bi-directional communication with the Immunization Registry Exchange to both register immunization vaccine administration as well as query the forecast ensures greater continuity of care.
  • Access and exchange data from medical devices. The integration of home monitoring devices into the clinical workflow allows providers greater visibility into the health of the person they are treating outside of a traditional care setting. Having a real time recording of critical vitals creates a trending view for the care team and creates the opportunity for early intervention to avoid a costly emergency department visit or hospital readmission. Whole-person care demands this kind of integration.
  • Enable bi-directional clinical data exchange with health information exchanges (HIEs) and other healthcare providers. Enabling the exchange of data locally, regionally and statewide, as well as nationally through an interoperability framework like Carequality or the Commonwell Health Alliance liberates healthcare data and breaks down the silos of EHRs. These frameworks provide a single on ramp for providers to share clinical data on demand, which supports care coordination and integrated care. No longer is clinical data considered to be a competitive advantage, rather it is now considered ubiquitous and drives innovation and value based on the integration of tools and services. We’re no longer sacrificing usability for the sake of interoperability.

Check out Part 2 of our series next week when we explore adoption of EHR systems in relation to the 21st Century Cures Act.

 

Meet the Author

Carol Reynolds · Executive VP, Client Experience

From the CareThreads Blog

Realizing the Impact of a Single Platform Approach on Home and Community-Based Services

Realizing the Impact of a Single Platform Approach on Home and Community-Based Services

Tuesday, June 23 | Human Services,Post-Acute Care,Thought Leadership

Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) providers operate in an environment defined by complexity, tight margins and an unwavering commitment to the individuals they serve. These organizations are no strangers to doing more with less, balancing growing regulatory requirements, workforce challenges and increasing demand for services. In this reality, efficiency isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s essential for maintaining operational stability and delivering consistent, high-quality care.

Read the blog
Navigating HTI-1: What Rehab Therapy Practices Need to Know

Navigating HTI-1: What Rehab Therapy Practices Need to Know

Friday, June 19 | Interoperability

The new Health Technology Interoperability (HTI-1) framework has arrived, and it marks significant changes for how rehab therapy practices must capture, share, and utilize data. With the 2015 Edition gone, physical therapists and rehab practices have fresh regulatory requirements to consider—and they carry new implications for participating in value-based care, meeting Promoting Interoperability Standards and delivering more connected patient care.

Read the blog
The Three Pillars of a Sustainable Healthcare Revenue Cycle

The Three Pillars of a Sustainable Healthcare Revenue Cycle

Thursday, June 04 | Post-Acute Care,Thought Leadership

For many healthcare leaders "billing" is viewed as a back-office function. It is often treated as the final step to resolve issues that began weeks or even months earlier. In today's complex regulatory and reimbursement environment, this approach is no longer sustainable. Treating the revenue cycle as a siloed endpoint can lead to increased denials, delayed cash flow and staff burnout.

Read the blog