Federal regulations governing the confidentiality of drug and alcohol treatment records impact the clinical and operational processes of a wide variety of providers across the country, including Netsmart clients. Based largely on legislation originally adopted in 1972, these regulations – commonly referred to as 42 CFR Part 2 – apply to providers receiving federal funds and were designed to prevent the disclosure of patients’ substance use treatment records to employers, landlords, law enforcement and other parties for fear of stigma, discrimination and legal ramifications.
Much has changed since the 1970s, including the advent of integrated, coordinated care delivery models like health information exchanges (HIEs) and health homes, widespread use of electronic health records and connectivity tools, e-prescribing, medication-assisted treatment, and newer federal and state privacy and security safeguards.
The majority of patients with a serious mental illness or a substance use treatment disorder (SUD) also have co-morbid chronic diseases or conditions such as diabetes, COPD, heart disease or emphysema. Access to a person’s complete health record, including SUD information, allows their treating providers to make fully-informed diagnosis and treatment decisions. It also helps prevent risk of serious or even fatal drug interactions and unintended prescribing errors due to lack of complete patient information.
Why is this notable right now? Providers should understand how recent regulatory updates and more changes to come in 2021 based on legislation included in the CARES Act will impact how they manage SUD treatment information to positively impact the lives of those they serve.
New SAMHSA 42 CFR Part 2 Final Rule
In rare federal rulemaking attention to one topic, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has issued multiple updated 42 CFR Part 2 Final Rules in the past three years. The most recent Final Rule was announced July 15, 2020 and took effect August 14. It retains the foundation for confidentiality protection of SUD patient records created by federally-assisted SUD treatment programs (“Part 2” programs). The rule also:
These changes are significant because they continue to move Part 2 regulations toward a focus on supporting whole-person care, improving outcomes, bending the healthcare cost curve, reducing stigma, and treating patients with SUD in parity with patients that have other medical conditions.
Here is a summary of the latest Final Rule to help guide providers as they evaluate/adjust processes and workflows to comply with and optimize the rule.
Passage of the Protecting Jessica Grubb’s Legacy Act
Jessica Grubb died in 2016 at age 30 from an overdose of oxycodone after being prescribed the medication at discharge from a hospital following surgery. Despite letting doctors know she was in recovery from an opioid addiction, the information was not listed on her chart.
The Jessica Grubb’s Legacy Act (the Legacy Act) passed as part of the CARES Act in March. The Legacy Act includes significant statutory amendments that align 42 CFR Part 2 regulations more closely with HIPAA, while retaining strong penalties for violations and adding penalties for information breaches. Netsmart played a leading role in a coalition of patient advocacy and other organizations successfully advocating for passage of the Legacy Act.
Are the two related?
The latest SAMHSA Final Rule discussed above is related to a SAMHSA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued Aug. 26, 2019 and is not linked to the passage of the Legacy Act. Provisions outlined in the Final Rule will be in effect until SAMHSA issues an updated new Final Rule in 2021 related to the Legacy Act as required by law.
Netsmart advocacy on behalf of our clients
Netsmart has been a long-time advocate for updating 42 CFR Part 2 regulations to provide the ability for a person with a SUD or a history of diagnosis, treatment or referral for SUD to easily consent to share their substance use treatment health data with their treating providers, while also retaining strong privacy and anti-discrimination protections and penalties. We provided input to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and SAMHSA in the previous Part 2 rulemaking processes on this topic and will continue that involvement as SAMHSA initiates the Final Rule process for the Legacy Act.
Wednesday, September 21 | Human Services
By understanding mental health and suicide go hand-in-hand we can take the first step in reducing suicide risk and help heal our families, friends and loved-ones heal and grow forward as a community.More
Monday, September 19 | Human Services,Thought Leadership,Value-based Care
In our most recent blog, The Role of Peers and Mutual Support in Alcoholics Anonymous, we discussed the fascinating history of Alcoholics Anonymous and its contributions to today's health care continuum. Evolving in parallel to the mental health peer movement, AA and its affiliate organizations, e.g., Narcotics Anonymous came to identical conclusions about the unique value of mutual support. Join Denny Morrison, as he unpacks how often peers are used, how they are credentialed and how they affect the economics of health care in the United States.More
Monday, September 12 | Post-Acute Care,Thought Leadership,Netsmart in the Community,Legislative/Policy
Ready access to quality home healthcare services is critical to the future of our nation’s healthcare system and the millions receiving these services today. Jen Sherman, community strategist, Netsmart will be a voice for home health providers in Washington D.C. at the upcoming NAHC Advocacy Day and shares why the proposed rate cuts by CMS will leave a devastating negative economic and operational impact on home health and post-acute providers.More